Ofsted’s new Inspection Handbook – a cause for celebration

As detailed by Old Andrew here, I attended a meeting with the new National Director for Schools Policy, Sean Harford in Birmingham on Friday 25th July. This had followed a series of telephone calls and emails in which I provided “free consultancy” on Ofsted’s new Inspection Handbook.

Whatever your ideological stripe, whatever your beliefs about the purpose of education, everybody can, I hope, agree that reforming Ofsted is in everyone’s best interest. During the past month Sean has “taken a scythe” to the 500+ pages of subsidiary and subject specific guidance to produce a slimmed down document that will be useful to inspectors, and that while schools should be aware of it, it should not be seen as in any way prescriptive. And here it is.

Now, I’ve only had a hand in the guidance on Quality of Teaching, but here are some of the highlights:

Inspectors should not grade the quality of teaching in individual lesson observations, learning walks or equivalent activities. In arriving at a judgement on the overall quality of teaching, inspectors must consider strengths and weaknesses of teaching observed across the broad range of lessons. These must then be placed in the context of other evidence of pupils’ learning and progress over time, including work in their books and folders, how well pupils can explain their knowledge and understanding in subjects, and outcomes in tests and examinations.

This is pretty specific that teaching cannot be graded in one-off observations. The battle has been very much won on this point and the trial that ran in the Midlands throughout June and July will become policy from September.

Inspectors must not give the impression that Ofsted favours a particular teaching style. School leaders and teachers should decide for themselves how best to teach, and be given the opportunity, through questioning by inspectors, to explain why they have made the decisions they have and provide evidence of the effectiveness of their choices. Moreover, inspectors must not inspect, or report in a way that is not stipulated in the framework or this handbook. For example, they should not criticise teacher talk for being overlong or bemoan a lack of opportunity for different activities in lessons unless there is unequivocal evidence that this is slowing learning over time. It is unrealistic, too, for inspectors to expect that all work in all lessons will be matched to the specific needs of each individual pupil. Inspectors should not expect to see periods of pupils working on their own, or in groups in all lessons, and should not make the assumption that this is always necessary, desirable or even effective, which would clearly depend on the quality and challenge of the work set. On occasions, too, pupils are rightly expected to sit and listen to teachers, which of itself is an ‘active’ method through which knowledge and understanding can be acquired effectively. Inspectors should not criticise ‘passivity’ as a matter of course and certainly not unless it is evidently stopping pupils from learning new knowledge or gaining skills and understanding. When observing teaching, inspectors should be ‘looking at’ and reflecting on the effectiveness of what is being done to promote learning, not ‘looking for’ specific or particular things. Inspectors should gather robust evidence to judge and report on how well pupils acquire knowledge, learn well and engage with lessons.

Some of this will be familiar from the subsidiary guidance from last year, but the sections in bold are some of the points of which I feel particularly proud. There is now clear and unambiguous guidance that inspectors should not make assumptions about what they have observed, but ask teacher for clarification bout why decisions have been made. Obviously, if teachers can’t provided satisfactory answers to questions about their practice, they should expect to be given short shrift.

‘Independent learning’ has been changed to individual and group work. Robert Peal made the point in his Civitas report that ‘group work’ was the only ‘preferred Ofsted-style’ activity that is still explicitly praised in 2014 reports – hopefully, this will go some way to remedying that.

I’m particularly pleased that ‘passivity’ has been unpicked and the point that listening is recognised as being as active as any other form of learning. And I’m also chuffed that my suggestion that inspectors should be ‘looking at’ rather than ‘looking for’ has made the cut.

The other change which I think is important is this one:

Inspectors’ direct observation must be supplemented by a range of other evidence to enable inspectors to evaluate what teaching is like typically and the impact that teaching has had on pupils’ learning over time. Such additional evidence may include:

  • the school’s own evaluations of the quality of teaching and its impact on learning
  • discussions with pupils about the work they have undertaken, what they have learned from it and their experience of teaching and learning over longer periods
  • discussion about teaching and learning with teachers, teaching assistants and other staff
  • the views of pupils, parents and staff
  • scrutiny of pupils’ work, with particular attention to:
    • whether marking, assessment and testing are carried out in line with the school’s policy and if they are used effectively to help teachers improve pupils’ learning
    • the level of challenge provided, and whether pupils have to grapple appropriately with content, not necessarily ‘getting it right’ first time, which could be evidence that the work is too easy

This makes it abundantly clear that it is for schools to decide on their own marking, feedback and assessment policies and that there should be no ‘preferred Ofsted marking style’. I’m also pleased with the inclusion of ‘struggle’ as evidence of learning.

As Andrew has said in his blog, the tone of the meeting was frank, forthright, and Sean was open, entirely reasonable and more than willing to listen. He seemed genuinely interested in Andrew’s ideas to make the inspection process more reliable, and I look forward to hearing more on this subject.

Personally, I feel it’s a shame Ofsted are determined to retain the Quality of Teaching judgment, but if we have to have it, at least it’s now solidly sensible.

But before we get too excited, Ofsted are still capable of entertaining some potentially silly ideas. Some topics up for discussion over the next few months are:

  • Should we have genuinely ‘no notice’ inspections with schools not even receiving a warning telephone call. Sean was interested in our thoughts on this and we all agreed that notice periods, no matter how short, mainly serve to add unnecessarily to ordinary teachers’ stress levels.
  • Should we have a new “exceptional’ grade to recognise schools that go out of their way to spread excellent practice and support other schools. I think no: the 4 point grading system already has a warping effect and, as Policy Exchange’s report suggested, The outstanding grade should require evidence of outreach work.
  • Should there be a new ‘curriculum’ category to add to the judgements made on leadership and management, behaviour and safety, quality of teaching and attainment? I’m not sure about this one – my instinct is that we should be reducing what Ofsted report on rather than creating new things for schools to panic about.
  • And most excitingly, there may well be opportunities for ‘ordinary’ classroom teachers, not just SLT, to be seconded to Ofsted for temporary periods. This is something which has the potential for having a massively positive impact on both teachers and Ofsted alike.

Sean and Mike Cladingbowl will be keen to speak to teachers about these points (as well as others I’m sure) from September.

Related posts

School leaders, take note… (In light of the updated handbook for Ofsted Inspectors.) by @cazzypot

31 Responses to Ofsted’s new Inspection Handbook – a cause for celebration

  1. I’m increasingly convinced that it is the issue of willingness to ask teachers for clarification – indeed, in any way engage with them as listeners rather than (or at least before being) judges, that makes inspections such unpleasant and one-sided processes which often come up with such bizarre results. Encouraging this dialogue is certainly a step forward – but I look forward to seeing it in practice.

  2. Mark says:

    Well done guys. Absolutely fantastic achievement in persuading OFSTED to listen to the concerns of average teachers. No doubt there will still be “rogue” inspectors and Heads who stick with the comfort blanket of judging a teacher’s ability in 20 mins, but I do feel that huge strides have been made. 3 cheers for the bloggers!

    • David Didau says:

      Hopefully new recruitment, employment and training arrangements will have an impact on rogues. And Heads who have ignored changes will become increasingly isolated

  3. mroberts1990 says:

    In regards to no notice inspections – I think previously it would have been inappropriate to require this change if there was a particular learning style favoured by Ofsted or indeed it’s inspectors. Not every lesson would be to their favoured style because, frankly, it’s not sustainable, realistic or productive to expect all lessons to meet those past expectations. On top of that schools are extremely busy places and therefore a conventional lesson may not have been undergoing.

    However, with the change at ‘looking at’ rather than ‘looking for’ (which I think is brilliant) no notice inspections suddenly seem more achievable, and maybe even preferred. I do think, however, that there will be those teachers who still stress as much with notice inspections.

  4. As I wrote in my own blog: watseducation.wordpress.com

    “I want to get better – that is my aim.
    I do this not by external judgement, I do this by continuing to learn.

    There are many teachers I know who still cling to the ‘judgement’:

    “He said it was GOOD, so I’m alright.” or “Requires Improvement?! Rubbish, what does she know?!”

    I feel for them, if they decide they are alright, what is next? How precisely do they intend to improve?

    I like it when someone visits me and gives me clear and honest feedback, I like that culture. Those formal and informal comments about anything that goes on, followed by, “Have you thought about…?”, ” I read that…” I don’t necessarily need to be given a label as I once did.

    It comes to the culture of leadership and development.

    What do we as teachers want from observation? Validation or Development.

    If it is the first, then we might have an issue, but if what we really want and need, if what we can convince SLT (like me) and governors, LA and OfSted is that we just want to be better tomorrow than we were yesterday we might get somewhere.”

    This would suggest that we have made progress – As long as the ‘rogues’ are wheedled out, we might be getting somewhere.

  5. Moving in the right direction certainly. However, still plenty of scope for subjective judgements and simply finding evidence that matches the attainment indication.
    I particularly like the part about school leaders providing evidence to justify the effectiveness of their choices. In a twitter conversation this morning I suggested that this is the exact lever required to drive evidence-based teaching practice.

    • David Didau says:

      Yes – that’s exactly the case I made for its inclusion.

      On the subject of attainment – Ofsted discussed the idea of an algorithm that would form the basis of the attainment judgement – this would be a step in the right direction as it could be applied to all schools. The question then becomes, what do we include in the algorithm?

      • Danny Breen says:

        “Statistical algorithms greatly outdo humans in noisy environments….” Kahneman – Thinking, fast and slow. Although he was referring to the ability of algorithms to predict/forecast better than humans, I’m sure his point is applicable to making objective judgements.

        The other advantage of an algorithm is that schools would know their attainment judgement without the need for an Ofsted visit.

  6. chemistrypoet says:

    This looks like progress. There is still the opportunity for Ofsted orthodoxies to develop, of course (e.g. There must be evidence of grappling with content; what constitutes evidence?), excerbated by the limited scope of inspections. It would be helpful if there was a moratorium on inspectations to allow proper research and consideration to be given to these changes. (What are the unintended consequences of these changes?).

    • David Didau says:

      Always tricky to foresee unintended consequences (cf Black Swan) but a fair bit of thought has gone in to minimising the ones that were already happening. I doubt there’s political will for any kind of moratorium, and (I’m assuming) Ofsted aren’t allowed to just stop inspecting for a bit.

  7. […] Ofsted’s new Inspection Handbook – a cause for celebration. As detailed by Old Andrew here, I attended a meeting with the new National Director for Schools Policy, Sean Harford in Birmingham on Friday 25th July. […]

  8. dodiscimus says:

    Very nice work, David. Thanks due from many, I think.

  9. […] Ofsted’s new Inspection Handbook – a cause for celebration […]

  10. […] Ofsted’s new Inspection Handbook – a cause for celebration […]

  11. […] poll is based on the new Ofsted Handbook (for related blog posts, see Scenes From The Battleground, The Learning Spy and cazzypotsblog). Considering Ofsted instructors are now being guided to not favour a […]

  12. […] certain criteria to be met (this is mentioned further in David Didau’s excellent blog post here). This will lead to greater scrutiny on children’s progress, work and responses rather than […]

  13. […] led by legendary master Old Andrew Kenobi and flaxen maverick Jedi hero David Didau have recently begun to engage the inspectorate in dialogue. This has resulted in reiterations of policy and rewrites of the handbook, culminating in this […]

  14. […] on July 31 2014. It contains some much needed developments, detailed on David Didau’s excellent blog post on the changes to the Quality of Teaching guidance. Ofsted is still making very unfair demands of […]

  15. […] I’ve been holding Ofsted to account and finally succeeded in making my voice heard in the new Inspection Handbook? Maybe it’s the work I’ve done with a number of schools to improve pupils’ […]

  16. […] Ofsted’s new Inspection Handbook – a cause for celebration 30th July 2014 […]

  17. […] who judges learning, or worse, teaching on a single lesson is a fool. The argument over grading individual lesson has largely been won, but we are still shackled by the constraints of a lesson.  If we expect children to make progress […]

  18. […] National director for schools, Sean Harford, sent me a draft copy last July and I edited and rewrote much of the Quality of Teaching section. For better or worse, a lot of what’s in there is my fault. I’m particularly proud of […]

  19. […] be used to evaluate effective teaching. Mostly, the message has been received and understood. Even Ofsted got me to redraft the Quality of Teaching Section of the current Inspection Handbook to make it clear what can and can’t be achieved in lesson observations. But how then, […]

  20. […] Sometimes life takes a surreal twist. In January 2014 I predicted Ofsted would stop grading lessons within a maximum of two years. I was wrong. Grades had been scrapped by June the same yearGrades had been scrapped by June the same year! I then got a call from Sean Harford to cast eye over the new Inspection Handbook and was stunned to find that all my advice had been taken on board. […]

  21. […] credit Ofsted has worked hard to eliminate this kind of ideological idiocy. The fact that I was consulted on the wording and content of the July 2014 version of the Inspection Handbook still amazes me and I’m glad to see that even though the Handbook has undergone several […]

  22. […] of school inspections. Ofsted have made efforts to undo much of this in the last few years with thoughtful revisions of the Inspection Handbook and various ‘myth busting’ documents. But still, when a HMI speaks, school leaders […]

Constructive feedback is always appreciated

%d bloggers like this: